The Most Efficient Solar Panels in the World

If you are in the market for a solar energy system, then you might ask yourself: what are the most efficient solar panels in the world? With the industry changing so quickly, this question becomes harder and harder to answer with each passing year. However, there are currently still types of solar panel that are capture more solar rays than other. We call this measure of how much sunlight a panel can turn into electricity the solar panel efficiency. Let us take a closer look at the solar panel efficiency of some of the top brands.

Which Company Produces The Most Efficient Solar Panels?

As of now, SunPower remains the brand with the highest solar panel efficiency with a score of 22.2%. Following in its footsteps is Panasonic with a score of 21.6%, LG with a score of 21.1%, Hanwha Q Cells with a score of 19.6% and Solaria with a score of 19.4%. While these brands represent the top tier models, it is essential to keep in mind that they are also much more expensive than the average model. So, while they might provide more of a payoff in the long run, they require a much more substantial initial investment.

What is the Average Solar Panel Efficiency Range?

While the brand above may offer the best solar efficiency out there, most types of panels typically offer between fifteen and seventeen percent for their efficiency ratings. While this score is not too bad, you may need to include a few of them if you want to power your entire house. However, if you can afford the more expensive models, then it is always preferable to maximize efficiency instead of buying the cheaper brand. But ultimately, it comes down to cost versus value for your specific situation.

We hope this list helped you determine which brands produce the most efficient solar panels in the world. If you are interested in building your solar panel, then check out our article about the best solar panel kits you can buy.

Spread the love
Janice Friedman
 

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 0 comments

Leave a Reply: